IS ISRAEL STILL GOD’S CHOSEN PEOPLE?

 A Biblical Lecture on National Israel, the Purpose of Election, and the Spiritual Kingdom of Christ

This lesson is written from a Restoration Movement / New Testament fulfillment perspective and seeks to let Scripture interpret Scripture.

---

INTRODUCTION

Many today teach that modern national Israel still holds a special covenant status with God above all nations, and that the physical land promises remain permanently theirs by divine right.

But the New Testament reveals something different:

• Israel was chosen for a divine purpose.
• That purpose was to bring the Messiah into the world.
• In Christ, the old covenant system reached fulfillment.
• God’s people are now defined spiritually, not ethnically.
• The kingdom, promises, temple, priesthood, and inheritance are fulfilled in Christ and His church.

The issue is not whether Jews are loved by God. God desires the salvation of all people.

The issue is whether national Israel remains God’s covenant nation today.

The New Testament answer is no.

---

I. ISRAEL WAS CHOSEN FOR A PURPOSE

A. Israel was chosen to bring forth the Messiah

God chose Abraham’s lineage so that Christ would come into the world.

"In your seed all the nations of the earth shall be blessed”,
— Genesis 22:18a

Paul explains this seed ultimately points to Christ.

“Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, "And to seeds," as referring to many, but rather to one, "And to your seed," that is, Christ”.
— Galatians 3:16

Israel was never chosen because they were inherently superior.

“The Lord did not set His love on you nor choose you because you were more in number than any of the peoples…”
— Deuteronomy 7:7

Their election was functional and covenantal — to preserve the lineage through which the Savior would come.

---

B. Once Christ came, the purpose of national Israel was fulfilled

Jesus fulfilled what Israel pointed toward.

• Israel pointed to the true Son.
• The sacrifices pointed to the cross.
• The priesthood pointed to Christ.
• The temple pointed to His body.
• The land pointed to a greater inheritance.

The shadows gave way to reality.

“Things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ”.
— Colossians 2:17

---

II. GOD’S PEOPLE ARE NOW DEFINED SPIRITUALLY, NOT ETHNICALLY

A. Being a Jew physically no longer makes one part of God’s covenant people

Paul could not be clearer.

“For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh. But he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter; and his praise is not from men, but from God”.
— Romans 2:28-29

Under Christ, covenant identity is spiritual.

---

B. The true children of Abraham are those who have faith

“Therefore, be sure that it is those who are of faith who are sons of Abraham.”

— Galatians 3:7

Not genetics.

Not ethnicity.

Faith.

---

C. In Christ there is no ethnic covenant superiority

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”
— Galatians 3:28

The cross removed ethnic covenant distinction.

---

D. The church is now God’s chosen people

Peter uses Old Testament language once applied to Israel and applies it directly to the church.

“But you are A CHOSEN RACE, A royal PRIESTHOOD, A HOLY NATION, A PEOPLE FOR God's OWN POSSESSION, so that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light;”
— 1 Peter 2:9

The church inherits the covenant identity.

Not through flesh.

Through Christ.

---

III. THE KINGDOM OF GOD IS NO LONGER EARTHLY OR NATIONAL

A. Jesus rejected an earthly political kingdom

Many Jews expected a national restoration and earthly dominance.

But Jesus repeatedly rejected this concept.

“Jesus answered, "My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews; but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm."
— John 18:36

Christ did not come to establish geopolitical Israel.

He came to establish a spiritual kingdom.

---

B. The kingdom is spiritual

“For the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.”
— Romans 14:17

The New Covenant centers on transformed hearts, not territorial borders.

---

IV. THE LAND PROMISE WAS NEVER ULTIMATELY ABOUT PALESTINE

A. Even Abraham looked beyond the physical land

Hebrews explains Abraham understood there was something greater.

“For he was looking for the city which has foundations, whose architect and builder is God.”

— Hebrews 11:10

And again:

“But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God; for He has prepared a city for them.”
— Hebrews 11:16

The physical land was typological.

It pointed to a heavenly inheritance.

---

B. The New Testament expands the inheritance to the whole world

“For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.”
— Romans 4:13

Not merely Canaan.

The inheritance becomes universal in Christ.

---

C. Christians now inherit through Christ

“And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's descendants, heirs according to promise.”
— Galatians 3:29

The promise belongs to those in Christ.

---

V. THE OLD COVENANT SYSTEM PASSED AWAY

A. The old covenant became obsolete

“When He said, "A new covenant," He has made the first obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear.”
— Hebrews 8:13

The Mosaic covenant was temporary.

---

B. The wall separating Jew and Gentile was destroyed

“For He Himself is our peace, who made both groups into one and broke down the barrier of the dividing wall,”
— Ephesians 2:14

Christ united believing Jew and Gentile into one body.

---

C. There is now one people of God

"I have other sheep, which are not of this fold; I must bring them also, and they will hear My voice; and they will become one flock with one shepherd.”
— John 10:16

Not two covenant peoples.

One.

---

VI. WHAT ABOUT MODERN ISRAEL?

Modern Israel is a political nation-state.

But nowhere does the New Testament teach that modern geopolitical Israel is God’s covenant nation.

The New Testament consistently points believers away from:

• earthly Jerusalem,
• earthly temple systems,
• earthly priesthood,
• earthly sacrifices,
• earthly nationalism,

and toward Christ.

---

VII. THE TRUE JERUSALEM IS HEAVENLY

A. The New Jerusalem is spiritual

“But the Jerusalem above is free; she is our mother.”
— Galatians 4:26

---

B. Christians already belong to the heavenly Zion

“But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to myriads of angels,”
— Hebrews 12:22

Notice:

Not “you will come.”

“You HAVE come.”

The fulfillment is present and spiritual.

---

VIII. DOES GOD STILL LOVE JEWISH PEOPLE?

Absolutely.

Jews are loved by God just like every other people group.

The gospel is still for them.

“For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, abounding in riches for all who call on Him;”
— Romans 10:12

Salvation is available equally to all through Christ.

But no one is saved by ethnic identity.

Only by Jesus Christ.

---

IX. ROMANS 11 DOES NOT TEACH NATIONAL ISRAEL’S FUTURE SUPREMACY

Romans 11 is often misunderstood.

Paul’s point is not that ethnic Israel remains permanently God’s covenant nation.

His point is:

• Jews can still be saved through faith in Christ.
• Gentiles should not become arrogant.
• Unbelieving Jews were broken off.
• Believing Gentiles were grafted in.

“Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear;”
— Romans 11:20

Faith — not ethnicity — determines covenant standing.

---

CONCLUSION

The Bible teaches:

• Israel was chosen to bring forth the Messiah.
• Christ fulfilled the Old Covenant system.
• God’s people are now spiritual, not national.
• The church is the holy nation in Christ.
• The inheritance is heavenly.
• The kingdom is spiritual.
• The promises are fulfilled in Jesus.

The focus of the New Testament is never:
“Return to ethnic Israel.”

The focus is always:
“Come to Christ.”

Because in Christ:

• Jew and Gentile become one.
• The shadows are fulfilled.
• The true temple stands.
• The true kingdom reigns.
• The true inheritance is received.

“For as many as are the promises of God, in Him they are yes; therefore also through Him is our Amen to the glory of God through us.”
— 2 Corinthians 1:20

DW

The Gift of Tongues in the New Testament: A Real Language for a Real Purpose

 

Few subjects in the New Testament create more confusion today than the subject of speaking in tongues. Many assume the gift described in Scripture refers to ecstatic or heavenly speech that cannot be understood. Yet when we examine the Bible carefully, a very different picture emerges.

In the New Testament, the gift of tongues was not mystical speech or unintelligible sounds. It was the miraculous ability to speak a real human language that the speaker had never learned, and it served a very specific purpose in the early church: to proclaim the gospel to all nations.

When the Scriptures are allowed to define their own terms, the meaning becomes clear.

Tongues Were Known Human Languages

The clearest example of speaking in tongues occurs on the Day of Pentecost.

In Acts 2, the Holy Spirit came upon the Apostles, and they began speaking in tongues. But notice what the text says the people heard:

Acts 2:7-8

7 They were amazed and astonished, saying, "Why, are not all these who are speaking Galileans? 8 "And how is it that we each hear them in our own language to which we were born? NASU

Luke then lists the many regions represented that day—Parthians, Medes, Elamites, Egyptians, Romans, and others (Acts 2:9-11). The miracle was not that people were speaking nonsense sounds. The miracle was that Galilean men suddenly spoke real languages they had never studied.

The crowd testified:

“We do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.” (Acts 2:11)

The word tongues simply means languages. The Greek word glōssa refers to an actual language spoken by a people group.

Every example of tongues in Scripture follows this same pattern.

Tongues Were Given to Spread the Gospel to All Nations

Jesus had already given the apostles their mission before His ascension:

“Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all nations…” (Matthew 28:19)

The gospel was not meant to remain in Jerusalem. It was meant for every tribe, nation, and language.

The miraculous gift of tongues helped accomplish this mission. Instead of spending years learning languages, the Apostles could instantly proclaim Christ to people from many nations.

At Pentecost, Jews from across the Roman world heard the gospel in their own languages and carried that message back to their homelands.

Tongues were therefore a missionary sign—a way for God to rapidly spread the message of Christ during the church’s earliest days.

Tongues Were Always Understandable

Another important fact is that tongues in the New Testament were meant to be understood.

In 1 Corinthians 14, Paul addressed the misuse of spiritual gifts in the church at Corinth. Some were speaking in languages no one present understood, which created confusion during worship.

Paul corrected this practice by saying:

1 Corinthians 14:9

9 So also you, unless you utter by the tongue speech that is clear, how will it be known what is spoken? For you will be speaking into the air. NASU

He then made the purpose clear:

1 Corinthians 14:19

19 however, in the church I desire to speak five words with my mind so that I may instruct others also, rather than ten thousand words in a tongue. NASU

If no one could interpret the language, the speaker was to remain silent (1 Corinthians 14:28). Why? Because the goal of every spiritual gift was edification through understanding.

Biblical tongues were never meant to be meaningless sounds. They were real languages meant to communicate truth.

Tongues Were a Sign to Unbelievers

Paul also explained that tongues served as a sign.

1 Corinthians 14:22

22 So then tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers…NASU

This statement connects tongues with Old Testament prophecy. Paul quotes Isaiah 28:11, where God warned Israel that because of their unbelief, He would speak to them through “other tongues.”

On Pentecost, Jews from many nations heard God’s message through foreign languages, confirming that the gospel was now going out to the entire world.

Tongues were therefore a confirming sign that the new covenant message had arrived.

“Tongues of Men and of Angels” Still Refers to Language

One passage that is often used to argue for a heavenly prayer language is 1 Corinthians 13:1.

Paul writes:

“If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.” (1 Corinthians 13:1, NASU)

Some assume Paul is teaching that believers can speak a mysterious heavenly language known only to angels. But a careful reading of the passage shows that Paul is not describing an actual spiritual gift being practiced. Instead, he is using deliberate exaggeration to make a point about love.

The entire section is written in hypothetical language.

Paul continues:

“If I have the gift of prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge…”
“If I have all faith, so as to remove mountains…”
“If I give all my possessions to feed the poor…”
“If I surrender my body to be burned…” (1 Corinthians 13:2–3)

Paul is not claiming that he literally possesses all knowledge, all faith, or that he will give away every possession. He is using powerful examples to show that even the greatest imaginable spiritual achievements are worthless without love.

The same is true of the phrase “tongues of men and of angels.”

It is a rhetorical contrast:

• Tongues of men – the languages spoken among people
• Tongues of angels – the highest possible form of speech Paul could imagine

But even if someone could speak in the most exalted way possible, Paul says it would still be meaningless without love.

Just two chapters later, when Paul gives actual instruction about tongues, he consistently treats them as languages that must be understood or interpreted.

“Unless you utter by the tongue speech that is clear, how will it be known what is spoken?”
(1 Corinthians 14:9, NASU)

If no interpreter was present, the speaker was to remain silent (1 Corinthians 14:28). This instruction only makes sense if tongues were real languages capable of being translated.

Therefore, 1 Corinthians 13:1 is not teaching a heavenly prayer language. It is simply part of Paul’s larger argument that love is greater than any spiritual gift.

The consistent testimony of the New Testament remains the same:
the gift of tongues was the miraculous ability to speak real languages that had not been learned, so that the message of Christ could reach people from every nation.

Angels in Scripture Always Speak Human Languages

Another important point often overlooked is that whenever angels appear in the Bible, they speak in normal human language that people can understand.

There is not a single example in Scripture where an angel speaks in mysterious or unintelligible sounds.

For example:

When the angel Gabriel appeared to Mary, he spoke in clear language:

“Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.”
(Luke 1:28, NASU)

Mary understood what was said and even asked questions in response.

Likewise, when the angel appeared to the shepherds at the birth of Christ, the message was clearly understood:

“Do not be afraid; for behold, I bring you good news of great joy which will be for all the people.” (Luke 2:10, NASU)

Throughout Scripture, angels consistently communicate in normal, understandable language because God intends His message to be understood.

Therefore, even if Paul hypothetically refers to the “tongues of angels” in 1 Corinthians 13:1, the biblical record shows that angels themselves communicate in intelligible speech, not mystical sounds or heavenly gibberish.

This further confirms that the concept of incomprehensible speech does not come from the Bible.

The Greek Word for Tongues Always Means Language

Another important piece of evidence is the Greek word translated “tongues.”

The word used in the New Testament is glōssa, which literally means:

• tongue
• language
• a language spoken by a people group

When Luke records the events of Pentecost, he removes all doubt about the meaning by pairing the word glōssa with another Greek word.

Acts 2:6 (NASU) “each one of them was hearing them speak in his own language.”

The word translated language here is dialektos, which means dialect or native language.

Luke is deliberately explaining what the miracle was: people heard the apostles speaking in the actual languages of their homelands.

This is why the crowd asked:

“How is it that we each hear them in our own language to which we were born?”
(Acts 2:8, NASU)

The same understanding continues in 1 Corinthians 14, where Paul refers to tongues as a language that has meaning.

“If then I do not know the meaning of the language, I will be to the one who speaks a barbarian.” (1 Corinthians 14:11, NASU)

The word barbarian simply meant someone speaking a foreign language you could not understand.

Paul’s point is simple: If a language is spoken and no one understands it, it does not edify the church.

This instruction only makes sense if tongues were real languages capable of interpretation.

The Consistent Teaching of the New Testament

When all the passages are examined together, the New Testament presents a consistent picture.

The gift of tongues was:

• a miraculous ability to speak real languages not previously learned
• given to help spread the gospel among the nations
• intended to communicate the Word of God clearly
• used as a confirming sign of the apostles’ message
• temporary and connected to the apostolic age

Rather than producing confusion, the biblical gift of tongues removed language barriers so that people could hear and understand the message of Christ.

And that message—preserved in the Scriptures—continues to be proclaimed to the world today.

Miraculous Gifts Were Temporary

The New Testament also teaches that miraculous gifts were not intended to last forever.

Paul wrote:

1 Corinthians 13:8-10

8 Love never fails; but if there are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away; if there are tongues, they will cease; if there is knowledge, it will be done away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part; 10 but when the perfect comes, the partial will be done away. NASU

The early church was in a foundational stage. God confirmed the message of the Apostles through miracles and signs.

Hebrews explains this clearly:

Hebrews 2:3-4

3 how will we escape if we neglect so great a salvation? After it was at the first spoken through the Lord, it was confirmed to us by those who heard, 4 God also testifying with them, both by signs and wonders and by various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit according to His own will. NASU

Notice the order:

1. Jesus proclaimed the gospel.
2. The Apostles confirmed it.
3. God bore witness through miracles.

These miracles authenticated the Apostles as the true messengers of Christ.

The Gifts Were Given Through the Apostles

Another key fact is that the New Testament consistently shows miraculous gifts being imparted through the apostles.

For example:

Acts 8:17

17 Then they began laying their hands on them, and they were receiving the Holy Spirit. NASU

When the apostle John and Peter laid hands on believers, spiritual gifts were given.

Simon the sorcerer observed this and tried to purchase the power:

Acts 8:18

18 Now when Simon saw that the Spirit was bestowed through the laying on of the apostles' hands…NASU

The ability to transmit these gifts belonged to the Apostles. Once the Apostles died, the means of passing these gifts on disappeared.

When the Apostles Passed Away, the Gifts Ceased

By the end of the first century, the apostles had died and the New Testament writings had been completed. The church no longer needed miraculous signs to confirm the message.

The gospel had already been established, and the faith had been delivered once for all.

“The faith which was once delivered unto the saints.” (Jude 3)

Without apostles to impart the gifts, the miraculous abilities naturally ceased with that generation.

What remained was something even more powerful: the completed Word of God.

The True Power Today Is the Word of God

The church today does not depend on miraculous signs. Our authority is the revealed Word of God.

Scripture teaches:

2 Timothy 3:16

16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; NASU

The Word is sufficient to teach, correct, and guide the church.

Rather than seeking new revelations or signs, believers are called to preach the gospel faithfully, just as the Apostles did.

Conclusion

The New Testament gift of tongues was a miraculous ability to speak real human languages that had never been learned. Its purpose was to spread the gospel rapidly among the nations and confirm the authority of the Apostles.

Tongues were understandable, purposeful, and temporary. Once the apostles completed their mission and passed from the scene, the miraculous gifts ceased.

What remains today is the enduring foundation of the church: the inspired Word of God.

And through that Word, the gospel continues to reach every nation.

Let me end with this:

The Early Church Did Not Practice Modern “Tongues”

Another important piece of evidence comes from church history.

If the modern practice of ecstatic speech were truly the same gift described in the New Testament, we would expect to see it continue regularly in the church after the apostles died. But the historical record shows something very different.

The leaders of the early church—men who lived closest to the time of the apostles—never describe the kind of tongues commonly practiced today.

In fact, many of them spoke of miraculous gifts as something that belonged to the apostolic age.

For example, John Chrysostom (A.D. 347–407), one of the most respected early Christian teachers, wrote while commenting on 1 Corinthians 12:

“This whole place is very obscure; but the obscurity is produced by our ignorance of the facts referred to and by their cessation, being such as then used to occur but now no longer take place.”

Chrysostom acknowledged that the miraculous gifts mentioned by Paul had already ceased by his time.

Likewise, Augustine (A.D. 354–430) explained that tongues served a specific purpose when the church first began:

“These were signs adapted to the time. For there behooved to be that betokening of the Holy Spirit in all tongues… because the Gospel of God was to run through all tongues over the whole earth.”

Augustine recognized that tongues were connected to the initial spread of the gospel among the nations.

Once that purpose had been accomplished, the sign was no longer needed.

Even earlier, church writings from the second and third centuries focus on teaching, preaching, and preserving the apostolic doctrine, not on continuing miraculous language gifts.

This historical silence is significant.

The kind of ecstatic speech often practiced today does not appear in the writings of the early church. Instead, what we see is a church centered on the Apostolic teaching preserved in Scripture.

                                                                                                                                            DW